Fair, many don't think so...
To NSW and Qld horse lovers
I think that I can speak for all horse owners and say that we are very sorry for your misfortune of having ill horses or watching and hoping that your horse(s) escapes the flu. Reading the blogs, my admiration goes out to all and your positive attitude is incredible.
In regard to Victoria and other presently EI free states I find it's interesting that we are still not asked to track movements of our horses, follow hygienic procedures, monitor their temperate twice daily (charts and advice on the DPI web site) and follow what is asked of the racing industry.
I question how long the ban on competitions will continue as we are not being prepared for future comps. Of course it would be time consuming but the world for horse owners has changed, perhaps forever. In making these suggestions, I want to acknowledge that we agist our horse 15 minutes away and would be very inconvenienced by safety precautions but that would then become our choice if that's what would be required to compete.
Also I question why the RASV (at the same time as racing industry was asked) could not have given advice and insisted that if competitors still wanted to compete at Melbourne you would have to demonstrate all required procedures. And it's not too hard to insist that the general public be required to stay behind a 5-metre barrier as the racing industry. It's a kick in the guts to know that racing is going ahead with thousands of the general public involved only a few kms from the show grounds, makes Mark O'Sullivan's explanations (on RASV web site) seem like a joke.
There is time and cost involved for everyone who has a horse(s) but people who compete at a senior already incur huge costs on a weekly basis, and still do but can't compete even through there is not to date any EI in Victoria. For all those still seeing it as too much of a risk would naturally choose not to attend horse comps, PC, 3DE etc..
Many of us agree it's to protect the money driven, racing industry and if we are right I think we can safety assume that there will be no competitions for 'pleasure horses' till after the spring carnival. Of course then the Autumn carnival is only three months away after the Spring season so perhaps we should consider that there will be a 9 mth ban on 'pleasure horses' competing again. But in saying that I am very happy to be wrong and hope that we will soon compete.
All the organisations who we pay to support us may need to consider partial refunds for the time period that we can not compete as they are supporting the decisions for us not being able to compete! That may at least demonstrate fairness and their commitment to their decisions.
Thank you for this opportunity to voice my opinion and I look forward to feedback,
Best wishes to all
Lorraine Harvey
I think that I can speak for all horse owners and say that we are very sorry for your misfortune of having ill horses or watching and hoping that your horse(s) escapes the flu. Reading the blogs, my admiration goes out to all and your positive attitude is incredible.
In regard to Victoria and other presently EI free states I find it's interesting that we are still not asked to track movements of our horses, follow hygienic procedures, monitor their temperate twice daily (charts and advice on the DPI web site) and follow what is asked of the racing industry.
I question how long the ban on competitions will continue as we are not being prepared for future comps. Of course it would be time consuming but the world for horse owners has changed, perhaps forever. In making these suggestions, I want to acknowledge that we agist our horse 15 minutes away and would be very inconvenienced by safety precautions but that would then become our choice if that's what would be required to compete.
Also I question why the RASV (at the same time as racing industry was asked) could not have given advice and insisted that if competitors still wanted to compete at Melbourne you would have to demonstrate all required procedures. And it's not too hard to insist that the general public be required to stay behind a 5-metre barrier as the racing industry. It's a kick in the guts to know that racing is going ahead with thousands of the general public involved only a few kms from the show grounds, makes Mark O'Sullivan's explanations (on RASV web site) seem like a joke.
There is time and cost involved for everyone who has a horse(s) but people who compete at a senior already incur huge costs on a weekly basis, and still do but can't compete even through there is not to date any EI in Victoria. For all those still seeing it as too much of a risk would naturally choose not to attend horse comps, PC, 3DE etc..
Many of us agree it's to protect the money driven, racing industry and if we are right I think we can safety assume that there will be no competitions for 'pleasure horses' till after the spring carnival. Of course then the Autumn carnival is only three months away after the Spring season so perhaps we should consider that there will be a 9 mth ban on 'pleasure horses' competing again. But in saying that I am very happy to be wrong and hope that we will soon compete.
All the organisations who we pay to support us may need to consider partial refunds for the time period that we can not compete as they are supporting the decisions for us not being able to compete! That may at least demonstrate fairness and their commitment to their decisions.
Thank you for this opportunity to voice my opinion and I look forward to feedback,
Best wishes to all
Lorraine Harvey